After all the brain wrecking done in making your time table,
getting acquainted with the exam system, understanding the grading procedure,
etc. a lot of questions arise in our minds regarding FFCS. Many of which are
still unanswered. This article is not only for the freshers to read. Every
VITian should read this. FFCS since its inception has faced many difficulties,
it is fired with many question by the students; not only questions but also
abuses. Fully F**ked up Crediting System has become a pet name of FFCS amongst
those who have seen the dark side of it. Here are some of the discrepancies of
FFCS which need to be corrected.
Lucky Strike
As discussed earlier, the registration of courses runs for 2 days
for a particular badge. All the students are equally and randomly divided into
different groups. Starting on 1st day morning from 8:00 to evening
8:00, and the same timing on 2nd day, each group is given a 2 hour
slot. This is done since the university doesn’t have a server that can cater
3500 people simultaneously. Thus your registrations can be on 1st
day early in the morning if you are lucky enough and can even be on last day
night if you are so low on luck. The thing that happens is if you have an early
time, more seats are left in your desired subjects and you get a wide range of
subjects to choose from. If you have the registrations late, hardly any seats
are available in the slot preferred by you for that subject; worst case
scenario: the subject is not at all available as all the slots are full.
The point to question is that what method are they adopting when
it comes to dividing the students amongst these 2 days? Sometimes, this method
can get very unfair on the students part. Although VIT has made 1 change that
the preference will be given as per seniority in year. The registrations for
Winter Sem 2011-12 were thus executed in some better way. 4th year
students were allowed to do it 1st followed by 3rd and 2nd
years and lastly the 1st years. It ensured a bit smoother
functioning. But nothing much was done on the method of giving preference
amongst the same year.
It so happened in Fall Sem 2011-12 that many 3rd years
had their registrations before 4th years. These people ended up
taking those subjects that are ideally meant for 4th years. End result: the 4th
years didn’t get their subjects, perhaps the only subjects that were left for
them to finish. This created a huge crisis situation when the semester started.
Although it was soon solved during the add/drop period. But good thing is that
the university learnt from its mistake and avoided such a crisis in winter.
The only suggestion to make the system better in this aspect is to
make the server capable enough to cater 4000 people together logging in for
registrations.
Running around the campus
The campus is as big as 350 acres. With the walking distance
between some buildings being more than 10 minutes, the 1st years
face a lot of problems with this. They end up making a time table where they
have to run 600 to 1000 meters in no time. Also, in most cases, teachers hoist
the banner of punctuality and do not co operate with the students. Running a
kilometer with heart rate being 160 bpm, the last thing you would
like to hear when you enter the class is, “You are late, GET LOST!!!” Teachers
recommend using a bicycle, but it often gets stolen. The other solution is to
use the bus facility offered by the campus. Personally speaking, it is very
unreliable. And that is what every senior would tell. The only worthy solution
is that teachers should provide at least 10-15 minutes of buffer time to the
students. Some teachers have also adopted this method, but most of them instead
of excusing us, ask us, “why did you select such a slot???”
Well this remains to be a hot topic in the Student-Teacher
Conflict; an issue which is discussed with an enthusiasm at VIT equvivalent to
that given to the Human Wildlife conflict in the outer world.
While the seniors don’t fall in such a problem, a 1st
year is bound to get into this problem as he is unfamiliar with the campus.
Absolute Grading in Relative System
Although, as discussed previously, the whole system is relative,
there are some things that are still absolute. Absolute grading is used for all
the lab only courses. Why so? Another question – unanswered. For lab only
courses, 90-100 marks gives you an S grade, 80-90 gives you an A, so on till
60, a D for 55-60, E for 50-55 and F for under 50. The problem here is that if
it is a strict teacher, you are in some trouble, and if it is a lenient
teacher, it’s party time.
What if an average student get 85 in a lab only course under his
faculty and the topper of the class under some other faculty is stuck at 76, is
it fair to give Mr. Topper B grade when Mr. Average will get A? Another one –
unanswered.
Although such a problem
never arise in theory only subject, it surprisingly traps in the embedded
subjects as well. The total marks of student in embedded subjects are decided
by
total marks = (theory marks * theory credits + lab marks * lab credits) / total credits
In a theory class of 65, definitely the students will be in
different lab classes. The problem with the lab only courses’ absolute grading also
arises here and may affect the total marks of the students in positive or
negative way. This is a very serious and delicate matter which should be dealt
with proper understanding.
Biodiversity amongst the teachers
Each person thinks differently, each teacher has a different
outlook in teaching. Some believe in strict correction, others in lenient. Some
are skilled enough to put every thing into the students’ heads; some are dumb
enough to put the students to sleep in their lecture. This becomes one of the
major drawbacks of FFCS. You don’t know which teacher suits your learning
style. An unskillful teacher can ruin your knowledge of entire subject. It is believed
that a skilled teacher checks his papers a bit more strictly whereas an
unskilled teacher tries covering himself with showering marks. This may be very
favorable in the absolute grading system but it’s not at all helpful in relative
grading. Remember, if you get high marks, everyone else will also get high
marks resulting your grade to be around the average since average is very high.
Thus an unskilled teacher is a liability to both, the university and the
students. A skilled teacher on the other hand not only awards you deserving
marks, but also strengthens your knowledge about the subject. Seniors always
recommend their juniors to choose those teachers that shower marks. But that is
not the case, I advise you to choose such a teacher who can make you capable
enough to pull out good marks even in the toughest condition.
The question arises that how to find out which teacher is better
on the day of registrations? That is again one of the questions unanswered.
Well these are just 4 of the many unanswered questions, the
biggest being “Did they make a right choice by putting FF before CS…?”
Personally, what I think is that it is a brilliant system but not
at all recommendable for the 1st years. At least not in the 1st
sem. That is a better than all if not ideal solution that my experience can
provide.
The system still is a very good one. Although it is still in its cradle,
when it will become a fully grown system surely many colleges and universities
will be inspired by it and will adopt it. This will leave the name of VIT
Universities in the history of smart education as one of the Pioneers of a
System that gives its students THE POWER OF CHOICE.
I hope you enjoyed and learned
something from the blog, do comment your questions and queries. Thank you very
much for following the blog.